posted on 2005-03-15, 00:00authored byNathan W. Ockwig, Olaf Delgado-Friedrichs, Michael O'Keeffe, Omar M. Yaghi
The structures of all 1127 three-periodic extended metal−organic
frameworks (MOFs) reported in the Cambridge Structure Database
have been analyzed, and their underlying topology has been
determined. It is remarkable that among the almost infinite number
of net topologies that are available for MOFs to adopt, only a
handful of nets are actually observed. The discovery of this
inversion between expected and observed nets led us to deduce a
system of classification “taxonomy” for interpreting and rationalizing known MOF structures, as well as those that will be made in
future. The origin of this inversion is attributed to the different
modes with which MOF synthesis has been approached. Specifically, three levels of complexity are defined that embody rules
“grammar” for the design of MOFs and other extended structures.
This system accounts for the present proliferation of MOF structures of high symmetry nets, but more importantly, it provides the
basis for designing a building block that “codes” for a specific
structure and, indeed, only that structure.