posted on 2019-08-23, 20:17authored byKattathu Mathew, Theresa Kayzar-Boggs, Zsolt Varga, Amy Gaffney, Joanna Denton, James Fulwyler, Katherine Garduno, Andrew Gaunt, Jeremy Inglis, Russ Keller, William Kinman, Dana Labotka, Elmer Lujan, Joel Maassen, Tara Mastren, Iain May, Klaus Mayer, Adrian Nicholl, Chelsea Ottenfeld, Tashi Parsons-Davis, Donivan Porterfield, Jung Rim, John Rolison, Floyd Stanley, Rob Steiner, Lav Tandon, Mariam Thomas, Richard Torres, Kerri Treinen, Maria Wallenius, Allison Wende, Ross Williams, Josh Wimpenny
An
intercomparison of the radio-chronometric ages of four distinct
plutonium-certified reference materials varying in chemical form,
isotopic composition, and period of production are presented. The
cross-comparison of the different 234U/238Pu, 235U/239Pu, 236U/240Pu, and 241Am/241Pu model purification ages obtained at
four independent analytical facilities covering a range of laboratory
environments from bulk sample processing to clean facilities dedicated
to nuclear forensic investigation of environmental samples enables
a true assessment of the state-of-practice in “age dating capabilities”
for nuclear materials. The analytical techniques evaluated used modern
mass spectrometer instrumentation including thermal ionization mass
spectrometers and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers for
isotopic abundance measurements. Both multicollector and single collector
instruments were utilized to generate the data presented here. Consensus
values established in this study make it possible to use these isotopic
standards as quality control standards for radio-chronometry applications.
Results highlight the need for plutonium isotopic standards that are
certified for 234U/238Pu, 235U/239Pu, 236U/240Pu, and 241Am/241Pu model purification ages as well as other multigenerational
radio-chronometers such as 237Np/241Pu. Due
to the capabilities of modern analytical instrumentation, analytical
laboratories that focus on trace level analyses can obtain model ages
with marginally larger uncertainties than laboratories that handle
bulk samples. When isotope ratio measurement techniques like thermal
ionization mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
with comparable precision are utilized, model purification ages with
similar uncertainties are obtained.