posted on 2024-09-16, 05:07authored bySubhajit Pal, Emanuele Palladino, Haozhen Yuan, Muireann Anna de h-Óra, Judith L. MacManus-Driscoll, Jorge Ontaneda, Vivek Dwij, Vasant G. Sathe, Joe Briscoe
Piezoresponse force
microscopy (PFM) is a robust characterization
technique to explore ferroelectric properties at the nanoscale. However,
the PFM signal can lead to misinterpretation of results due to the
dominant electrostatic interaction between the tip and the sample.
In this work, a detailed calibration process is presented and a procedure
to identify the parasitic phase offset is demonstrated. To obtain
artifact-free phase–amplitude loops, a methodology is developed
by combining the outcomes from switching spectroscopy-PFM (SS-PFM)
and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). It is demonstrated that
the phase and amplitude loops obtained from SS-PFM at a specific read
voltage, ascertained from the surface potential by KPFM, can convey
accurate electromechanical information. These methodologies are applied
to quantify the imprint voltage in BaTiO3 and BiFeO3, along with vertically aligned BaTiO3:Sm2O3 and BaTiO3:MgO nanocomposites. The variation
of the imprint voltage measured under different tip voltages demonstrates
the importance of selecting the correct read voltage in determining
the local imprint voltage. Additionally, 2D imprint voltage maps in
each domain of a BaTiO3 single crystal are obtained using
the datacube-PFM technique, which allows pixel-by-pixel determination
of artifact-free spatial variation of PFM phase–amplitude response.