posted on 2017-11-17, 00:00authored byMohammadmehdi Ataei, Huanchen Chen, Alidad Amirfazli
When a liquid bridge
is formed between two nonparallel identical
surfaces, it can move along the surfaces. Literature indicates that
the direction of bridge movement is governed by the wettability of
surfaces. When the surfaces are hydrophilic, the motion of the bridge
is always toward the cusp (intersection of the plane of the two bounding
surfaces). On the other hand, the movement is hitherto thought to
be always pointing away from the cusp when the surfaces are hydrophobic.
In this study, through experiments, numerical simulations, and analytical
reasoning, we demonstrate that for hydrophobic surfaces, wettability is not the only factor
determining the direction of the motion. A new geometrical parameter,
i.e., confinement (cf), was defined as the ratio of the distance of
the farthest contact point of the bridge to the cusp, and that of
the closest contact point to the cusp. The direction of the motion
depends on the amount of confinement (cf). When the distance between
the surfaces is large (resulting in a small cf), the bridge tends
to move toward the cusp through a pinning/depinning mechanism of contact
lines. When the distance between the surfaces is small (large cf),
the bridge tends to move away from the cusp. For a specific system,
a maximum cf value (cfmax) exists. A sliding behavior (i.e.,
simultaneous advancing on the wider side and receding on the narrower
side) can also be seen when a liquid bridge is compressed such that
the cf exceeds the cfmax. Contact angle hysteresis (CAH)
is identified as an underpinning phenomenon that together with cf
fundamentally explains the movement of a trapped liquid between two
hydrophobic surfaces. If there is no CAH, however, i.e., the case
of ideal hydrophobic surfaces, the cf will be a constant; we show
that the bridge slides toward the cusp when it is stretched, while
it slides away from the cusp when it is compressed (note sliding motion
is different from motion due to pinning/depinning mechanism of contact
lines). As such, the displacement is only related to geometrical parameters
such as the amount of compression (or stretching) and the dihedral
angle between the surfaces.