Version 2 2020-12-02, 19:04Version 2 2020-12-02, 19:04
Version 1 2020-11-23, 21:46Version 1 2020-11-23, 21:46
journal contribution
posted on 2020-12-02, 19:04authored byIgnacio Arribas Diez, Ireshyn Govender, Previn Naicker, Stoyan Stoychev, Justin Jordaan, Ole N. Jensen
Phosphopeptide enrichment is an essential
step in large-scale, quantitative phosphoproteomics by mass spectrometry.
Several phosphopeptide affinity enrichment techniques exist, such
as immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) and metal
oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC). We compared zirconium(IV) IMAC
(Zr-IMAC) magnetic microparticles to more commonly used titanium(IV)
IMAC (Ti-IMAC) and TiO2 magnetic microparticles for phosphopeptide
enrichment from simple and complex protein samples prior to phosphopeptide
sequencing and characterization by mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry, LC–MS/MS). We optimized sample-loading conditions
to increase phosphopeptide recovery for Zr-IMAC-, Ti-IMAC-, and TiO2-based workflows by 22, 24, and 35%, respectively. The optimized
protocol resulted in improved performance of Zr-IMAC over Ti-IMAC
and TiO2 as well as high-performance liquid chromatography-based
Fe(III)-IMAC with up to 23% more identified phosphopeptides. The different
enrichment chemistries showed a high degree of overlap but also differences
in phosphopeptide selectivity and complementarity. We conclude that
Zr-IMAC improves phosphoproteome coverage and recommend that this
complementary and scalable affinity enrichment method is more widely
used in biological and biomedical studies of cell signaling and the
search for biomarkers. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with
identifier PXD018273.