ac1c03422_si_001.pdf (1.19 MB)
Download fileUnderstanding the Impacts of Li Stripping Overpotentials at the Counter Electrode by Three-Electrode Coin Cell Measurements
journal contribution
posted on 2021-11-09, 20:13 authored by Jeesoo Seok, Cara N. Gannett, Seung-Ho Yu, Héctor D. AbruñaThe
evaluation of new materials, interfaces, and architectures
for battery applications are routinely conducted in two-electrode
coin cell experiments, which although convenient, can lead to misrepresentations
of the processes occurring in the cell. Few three-electrode coin cell
designs have been reported, but those which have involve complex cell
assembly, specialized equipment, and/or cell configurations which
vary drastically from the standard coin cell environment. Herein,
we present a novel, facile three-electrode coin cell design which
can be easily assembled with existing coin cell parts and which accurately
reproduces the environment of traditional coin cells. Using this design,
we systematically investigated the inaccuracies incurred in two-electrode
measurements in both symmetric/asymmetric cells and half-cell experiments
by galvanostatic charge/discharge, galvanostatic intermittent titration
technique (GITT), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and
cyclic voltammetry. From our investigation, we reveal that lithium
metal stripping contributes larger overpotentials than its nucleation/plating
processes, a phenomenon which is often misinterpreted in two-electrode
cell measurements.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
li stripping overpotentialstraditional coin cellselectrode cell measurementselectrode measurementsasymmetric cellscounter electrodevary drasticallysystematically investigatedspecialized equipmentroutinely conductedprocesses occurringplating processesoften misinterpretednew materialsinaccuracies incurredgalvanostatic chargeeis ),easily assembledcyclic voltammetrycell experimentscell configurationsbattery applicationsalthough convenientaccurately reproduces