posted on 2001-06-23, 00:00authored byAmitava Das, Vishwas Joshi, Dilip Kotkar, Vinit S. Pathak, V. Swayambunathan, Prashant V. Kamat, Pushpito K. Ghosh
The previously observed facile photooxidation of Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> to Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> in oxygenated solutions of 9 M
H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (Kotkar, D; Joshi, V.; Ghosh, P. K. <i>Chem. Commun</i>. <b>1987</b>, 4; Indian Patent No. 164358 (1989)) is
further studied. A similar phenomenon was observed with Ru(phen)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> but not with Ru(bpy)<sub>2</sub>[bpy-(CO<sub>2</sub>H)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>.
The reaction is strongly dependent on acid concentration, with a sharp change in the region of 2−7 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>. The quantum yield of Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> formation in 9 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> is close to the quantum yield of steady-state
luminescence quenching by O<sub>2</sub>. Photooxidation is accompanied by near-stoichiometric formation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> as
reduced product. Chromatographic, spectroscopic, electrochemical and optical rotation studies reveal that
Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> survives the strongly acidic environment with little evidence of either any change in coordination
sphere or ligand degradation, even after repeated cycles of photolytic oxidation followed by electrolytic
reduction. The high quantum yield and selectivity of the reaction is ascribed to (i) predominance of the electron
transfer quenching pathway over all others and (ii) highly efficient trapping of O<sub>2</sub><sup>•-</sup> by H<sup>+</sup> followed by rapid
disproportionation to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub>. These are likely on account of the high ionic strength of the medium
which favors the required shifts in the potentials of the O<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>2</sub><sup>•-</sup> and O<sub>2</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> couples. Upon storage of the
photooxidized Ru(III) solution in dark, partial recovery of Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> occurs gradually. Studies with the
electrooxidized complex over a range of acid concentrations indicate that Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> is regenerated by reaction
of Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. The reaction is promoted by increasing concentrations of [H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>] and inhibited by
[O<sub>2</sub>] and [H<sup>+</sup>]. The fraction of Ru(III) remaining after the reverse reaction is allowed to plateau in solutions
of varying acid concentrations follows a similar trend to that found after attainment of steady state in the
photooxidation reaction, although in all cases the forward reaction produces more Ru(III) than what remains
in the reverse reaction. These observations are consistent with the following equation 2Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup> + O<sub>2</sub> +
2H<sup>+</sup> →(<i>h</i>ν)/←(dark) 2Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for which the equilibrium constant has been computed. Light helps
overcome the activation barrier of the forward reaction by driving it via *Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>2+</sup>, and to the extent that
the photooxidation is driven past the equilibrium, there is conversion of light energy in the form of long-lived chemical products. Spectroscopic evidence rules out any significant shift in the redox potential of
Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+/2+</sup>, suggesting thereby that H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is much more stable in the more strongly acidic medium and
less capable of reducing Ru(bpy)<sub>3</sub><sup>3+</sup> unlike at higher pH.