posted on 1999-11-17, 00:00authored byOrde Q. Munro, Judith A. Serth-Guzzo, Ilona Turowska-Tyrk, K. Mohanrao, Tatjana Kh. Shokhireva, F. Ann Walker, Peter G. Debrunner, W. Robert Scheidt
The preparation and characterization of two crystalline forms of [Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4 with
distinctly different molecular structures are reported. Crystal structure analysis shows that paral-[Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4 has the axial imidazole ligands arranged in a relative parallel orientation (over a slightly
S4-ruffled porphyrin core) and perp-[Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4 has the axial imidazole ligands arranged in a
relative perpendicular orientation (over a considerably S4-ruffled porphyrin core). The two species have different
Mössbauer and solid-state EPR spectra. The small quadrupole splitting (ΔEq = 1.78(1) mm/s, 120 K) and a
single observable EPR gmax value (3.43 at 4.2 K) for perp-[Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4 are indicative of the
relative perpendicular arrangement of the axial ligands. The larger quadrupole splitting (ΔEq = 2.557(3) mm/s, 120 K) and rhombic g-tensor (g1 = 2.69, g2 = 2.34−2.43, and g3 = 1.75) in the solid state and in frozen
DMF−acetonitrile 3:1 (g1 = 2.64, g2 = 2.30, and g3 =1.80) at 4.2 K for paral-[Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4
are indicative of a relative parallel axial ligand orientation. The actual axial ligand dihedral angles are Δφ =
76° and Δφ = 26 or 30° for perp- and paral-[Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4, respectively, and thus the dihedral
angle at which the EPR spectral type changes from large gmax to rhombic must be 30 < Δφ < 76°. Because
the porphyrin and axial ligands are similar for both crystalline forms of [Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]ClO4, a more
direct correlation between molecular and electronic structure has been established. Molecular mechanics
calculations indicate that nonbonded interactions between the axial ligands and meso-mesityl groups of [Fe(TMP)(5-MeHIm)2]+ destabilize a relative parallel orientation for the axial ligands, yet the parallel orientation
is observed in all frozen solution samples as confirmed by EPR investigations. This is believed to be due to
the competing stabilization of the electronic state of the rhombically distorted parallel complex with an energy
stabilization of 2.8−3.7 kcal/mol, as compared to the energy destabilization of 2.6 kcal/mol obtained from
MM calculations.