posted on 2017-08-16, 00:00authored byJia-Syun Lu, Ming-Chung Yang, Ming-Der Su
The effect of substitution on the
potential energy surfaces of triple-bonded RGaPR (R = F, OH,
H, CH3, SiH3, SiMe(SitBu3)2, SiiPrDis2, Tbt
(C6H2-2,4,6-{CH(SiMe3)2}3), and Ar* (C6H3-2,6-(C6H2-2,4,6-i-Pr3)2)) compounds was theoretically examined by using density functional
theory (i.e., M06-2X/Def2-TZVP, B3PW91/Def2-TZVP, and B3LYP/LANL2DZ+dp).
The theoretical evidence strongly suggests that all of the triple-bonded
RGaPR species prefer to select a bent form with an angle (∠Ga–P–R)
of about 90°. Moreover, the theoretical observations indicate
that only the bulkier substituents, in particular, for the strong
donating groups (e.g., SiMe(SitBu3)2 and SiiPrDis2) can efficiently
stabilize the GaP triple bond. In addition, the bonding analyses
(based on the natural bond orbital, the natural resonance theory,
and the charge decomposition analysis) reveal that the bonding characters
of such triple-bonded RGaPR molecules should be regarded as R′Ga←PR′. In other words, the GaP triple bond involves one traditional
σ bond, one traditional π bond, and one donor–acceptor
π bond. Accordingly, the theoretical conclusions strongly suggest
that the GaP triple bond in such acetylene analogues (RGaPR)
should be very weak.