Theoretical Insights
on the Comparison of Li-Ion Conductivity
in Halide Superionic Conductors Li<sub>3</sub>MCl<sub>6</sub>, Li<sub>2</sub>M<sub>2/3</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub>, and LiMCl<sub>4</sub> (M =
Y, Sc, Al, and Sm)
Recently, halide materials for solid electrolytes have
received
modest research interest. A variety of new halide electrolytes, such
as Li<sub>3</sub>YCl<sub>6</sub>, Li<sub>3</sub>InCl<sub>6</sub>,
and Li<sub>2</sub>Sc<sub>2/3</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub> halospinel structure,
and LiAlCl<sub>4</sub>, have been experimentally prepared with high
Li-ionic conductivities close to 10<sup>–3</sup> S/cm and low
activation energies. Although much effort (experimental and theoretical)
has been devoted to uncovering the best combination of Li–M–X,
less attention has been paid to the structural effects on the ionic
conductivities and electrochemical stabilities. In this article, DFT
and AIMD simulations are performed to do a comparative study on several
halide electrolytes with selected structures, including the most common
rock-salt Li<sub>3</sub>MCl<sub>6</sub>, spinel Li<sub>2</sub>M<sub>2/3</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub>, and LiMCl<sub>4</sub>. It is revealed that
halospinel Li<sub>2</sub>M<sub>2/3</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub> structures
with cubic symmetry are three-dimensionally conducting and mechanically
stable superionic conductors. They exhibit an excellent Li-ionic conductivity
within the range 0.26–19.0 mS/cm with an activation energy
lower than 0.20 eV (0.342–0.195 eV). Among them, Li<sub>2</sub>Sm<sub>2/3</sub>Cl<sub>4</sub> is predicted to have an outstanding
balance between the ionic conductivity and stability. The room-temperature
ionic conductivity is calculated to be as high as 15.3 mS/cm, whereas
the band gap and electrochemical stability window vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup> reach 4.26 V, respectively, making it a promising candidate for
practical applications as a superionic conductor in solid-state batteries.