Systematic Underestimation of Pesticide Burden for
Invertebrates under Field Conditions: Comparing the Influence of Dietary
Uptake and Aquatic Exposure Dynamics
posted on 2021-12-09, 13:34authored byBenedikt
B. Lauper, Eva Anthamatten, Johannes Raths, Maricor Arlos, Juliane Hollender
Pesticides used in
agriculture can end up in nearby streams and
can have a negative impact on nontarget organisms such as aquatic
invertebrates. During registration, bioaccumulation potential is often
investigated using laboratory tests only. Recent studies showed that
the magnitude of bioaccumulation in the field substantially differs
from laboratory conditions. To investigate this discrepancy, we conducted
a field bioaccumulation study in a stream known to receive pollutant
loadings from agriculture. Our work incorporates measurements of stream
pesticide concentrations at high temporal resolution (every 20 min),
as well as sediment, leaves, and caged gammarid analyses (every 2–24
h) over several weeks. Of 49 investigated pesticides, 14 were detected
in gammarids with highly variable concentrations of up to 140 ±
28 ng/gww. Toxicokinetic modeling using laboratory-derived
uptake and depuration rate constants for azoxystrobin, cyprodinil,
and fluopyram showed that despite the highly resolved water concentrations
measured, the pesticide burden on gammarids remains underestimated
by a factor of 1.9 ± 0.1 to 31 ± 3.0, with the highest underestimations
occurring after rain events. Including dietary uptake from polluted
detritus leaves and sediment in the model explained this underestimation
only to a minor proportion. However, suspended solids analyzed during
rain events had high pesticide concentrations, and uptake from them
could partially explain the underestimation after rain events. Additional
comparison between the measured and modeled data showed that the pesticide
depuration in gammarids is slower in the field. This observation suggests
that several unknown mechanisms may play a role, including lowered
enzyme expression and mixture effects. Thus, it is important to conduct
such retrospective risk assessments based on field investigations
and adapt the registration accordingly.