Structure−Activity Relationships of Cyclic Peptide-Based Chemokine Receptor CXCR4
Antagonists: Disclosing the Importance of Side-Chain and Backbone Functionalities
posted on 2007-01-25, 00:00authored bySatoshi Ueda, Shinya Oishi, Zi-xuan Wang, Takanobu Araki, Hirokazu Tamamura, Jérôme Cluzeau, Hiroaki Ohno, Shuichi Kusano, Hideki Nakashima, John O. Trent, Stephen C. Peiper, Nobutaka Fujii
Previously, we have identified a highly potent CXCR4 antagonist 2 [cyclo(-d-Tyr-Arg-Arg-Nal-Gly-)]
and its Arg2 epimer 3 [cyclo(-d-Tyr1-d-Arg2-Arg3-Nal4-Gly5-)] by the screening of cyclic pentapeptide libraries
that were designed based on the structure−activity relationship studies on 14-residue peptidic CXCR4
antagonist 1. In the present study, a new series of analogues of 2 and 3 were synthesized to evaluate the
influences of peptide side-chain and backbone modification on bioactivities. Based on the Ala-scanning
study, in which each residue in 2 and 3 was replaced with Ala having the identical chirality, substitution of
Arg3 and Nal4 [Nal = l-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine] with Ala (compounds 6, 7, 10, 11) led to significant loss of
the potency, indicating these amino acids are more important contributors to the bioactivity. For the cyclic
peptide backbone, several modifications including d/l-Ala or cyclic amino acids substitution at the Gly5
position and sequential N-methylation on amide nitrogens were conducted. Among the analogues, compounds
13 [cyclo(-d-Tyr1-Arg2-Arg3-Nal4-d-Ala5-)] and 32 [cyclo(-d-Tyr1-d-MeArg2-Arg3-Nal4-Gly5-)] were close
in potency to the most potent lead 2. NMR and conformational analysis indicated that both of these analogues
favor the same backbone conformation as 2, whereas similar analysis of less potent analogues indicates that
an altered backbone conformation is favored. The conformational analysis showed that steric repulsion by
a 1,3-allylic strain-like effect across the planar peptide bond might contribute to the conformational preferences
of cyclic pentapeptides.