posted on 2015-10-29, 00:00authored byAlexander J. Tkalych, Kuang Yu, Emily A. Carter
NiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, long studied for its use in nickel-based
secondary batteries, has been the subject of much recent interest
due to its efficacy as an oxygen evolution catalyst. Despite extensive
study over more than a century, however, many outstanding questions
remain surrounding both the structure and the activity of NiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>. Further compounding this ambiguity is the
recent finding that much of the previous experimental work on NiO<sub><i>x</i></sub> may have been influenced by incidental doping.
Here, we report a computational study of the two simplest members
of the NiO<sub><i>x</i></sub> family: β-Ni(OH)<sub>2</sub> and β-NiOOH. Using DFT+<i>U</i> calculations,
we first identify a β-NiOOH structure with a staggered arrangement
of intercalated protons that is more consistent with experimental
crystal structures of β-NiOOH than previously proposed geometries.
Next, by conducting a thorough study of various initial spin configurations
of this β-NiOOH structure, we found that a low-spin d<sup>7</sup> Ni<sup>3+</sup> configuration is always favored, which suggests
a Jahn–Teller distortion, rather than disproportionation, explains
the different Ni–O bond distances found in experiment. <i>G</i><sub>0</sub><i>W</i><sub>0</sub> calculations
performed on β-Ni(OH)<sub>2</sub> and β-NiOOH reveal electronic
structures consistent with previous experimental results. Lastly,
calculations of various low-index surface energies of both β-Ni(OH)<sub>2</sub> and β-NiOOH demonstrate that the (001) surface is the
most thermodynamically stable surface, in keeping with numerous experimental
results but in contrast to recent computational models.