posted on 2025-11-07, 10:07authored byChao Zhu, Shigeru Kobayashi, Yuki Sugisawa, Franjo Weber, Kun-Han Lin, Miho Kitamura, Koji Horiba, Hiroshi Kumigashira, Kazunori Nishio, Ryota Shimizu, Daiichiro Sekiba, Taro Hitosugi, Rüdiger Berger
The current controversies about the role of space charge
layers
hinder the development of better solid–solid interfaces and,
thus, the improvement of solid-state batteries (ASSBs). To overcome
this, we have combined high spatial resolution and nondestructive
techniques, operando heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM),
and operando nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) to conduct a study of
space charge layers in ASSBs. A model thin-film ASSB was fabricated
from lithium (Li)|Li<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (LPO)|LiCoO<sub>2</sub> (LCO) for this study. This battery excels due to negligible interfacial
defects and side reactions. For a working battery voltage range from
3.0 to 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>, a space charge layer mainly exists
at the LPO|LCO interface. This space charge layer with a width <50
nm arises from the redistribution of Li-ions at the interface. We
clarified controversial views on the role of space charge layers in
ASSBs by quantitatively determining the interfacial space charge layer
resistance and found a maximum value between 18.4 and 19.1 Ω
cm<sup>2</sup> at 4.3 V vs Li/Li<sup>+</sup>. The absolute value of
interfacial resistance from space charge layer formation is much smaller
compared with the bulk solid electrolyte resistance in the fabricated
thin-film ASSB. By employing KPFM and NRA techniques in ASSB research,
our knowledge of space charge layer evolution at the solid electrolyte
electrode interface is more comprehensive, even beyond the investigation
of space charge layers.