Silica Nanoparticles
Decorated with Ceria Quantum
Dots Modulate Intra- and Extracellular Reactive Oxygen Species Formation
and Selectively Reduce Human A375 Melanoma Cell Proliferation
posted on 2024-09-16, 17:03authored byMarcela L. Chaki Borrás, Rajib Chandra Das, Philip J. Barker, Ronald Sluyter, Konstantin Konstantinov
Nanomaterials show great promise for cancer treatment.
Nonetheless,
most nanomaterials lack selectivity for cancer cells, damaging healthy
ones. Cerium dioxide (ceria, CeO2) nanoparticles have been
shown to exert selective toxicity toward cancer cells due to the redox
modulating properties they display as their size decreases. However,
these particles suffer from poor suspension stability. The efficacy
of CeO2 nanoparticles for cancer treatment is hampered
by their innate high surface energy, which leads to particle agglomeration
and, consequently, reactivity loss. This effect increases as particle
size decreases; as such, quantum dots (QDs) suffer most from this
phenomenon. In this study, it is proposed that silicon dioxide (silica,
SiO2) nanoparticles can provide an inert platform for surface
encrusted CeO2 QDs and that the resulting nanocomposite
(hereafter QDCeO2/SiO2) not only
will exhibit negligible agglomeration compared with CeO2 alone but also will improve the modulation of reactive oxygen species
(ROS) leading to selective reduction of human A375 melanoma cell proliferation.
The SiO2 nanoparticles had a bimodal size distribution
with median particle size of 66 and 168 nm, while the CeO2 quantum dots encrusted on their surface had a size of 3.2 nm. An
elevated Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio led to the QDCeO2/SiO2 nanocomposite displaying synergistic
superoxide dismutase- and catalase-like activity, favoring the accumulation
of ROS at pH 6.5 which translated into QDCeO2/SiO2 exerting selective oxidative stress in, and toward,
the melanoma cells. Treatment with 50 μg mL–1QDCeO2/SiO2 significantly reduced
cell proliferation by 27% compared to untreated control cells in the
colony formation assay. Treatment with either SiO2 or CeO2 alone did not affect the cell proliferation. These results
highlight the benefit of dispersing CeO2 QDs on the surface
of core nanoparticles and the resulting enhancement of selective redox
reactivity and proliferation arrest when compared to CeO2 nanoparticles alone. Furthermore, the method employed here to encrust
CeO2 QDs could lead to the facile synthesis of new nanocomposites
with enhanced control of ROS activity, not only for in vitro studies using other cancer cell lines of interest but also in animal
models and perhaps leading to clinical trials in melanoma patients.