Shared Binding Mode of Perrottetinene and Tetrahydrocannabinol Diastereomers inside the CB1 Receptor May Incentivize Novel Medicinal Drug Design: Findings from an in Silico Assay
journal contributionposted on 17.11.2020, 21:45 by Matheus Henrique Reis, Deborah Antunes, Lucianna H. S. Santos, Ana Carolina Ramos Guimarães, Ernesto Raul Caffarena
In recent years, therapeutic compounds derived from phytocannabinoids have brought renewed attention to the benefits they offer to ameliorate chronic disease symptoms. Among cannabinoids, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is a well-known component of the Cannabis plant, whose active principles have been studied through the years. Another psychoactive phytocannabinoid, derived from liverworts Radula, perrottetinene (PET), has created interest, especially as a pharmaceutical product and for its legal recreational use. Unfortunately, so far, the interaction mode of these compounds at the type 1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1R) binding site remains unknown, and no experimental three-dimensional structure in complex with THC or PET is available in the Protein Data Bank. Today, many computational methodologies can assist in this crusade and help unveil how these molecules bind, based on the already known pose of a structurally similar compound. In this work, we aim to elucidate the binding mode of THC and PET molecules in both cis and trans conformers, using a combination of several computational methodologies, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics, free energy calculations, and protein-energy network studies. We found that THC and PET interact similarly with the CB1R, in a different conformation depending on the considered diastereomer. We have observed that cis ligands adopted a half-chair conformation of the cycle ring containing the dimethyl group, assuming an axial or equatorial conformation producing a different induced fitting of the surrounding residues compared with trans ligands, with higher interaction energy than the trans conformer. For PET, we have seen that Trp-279 and Trp-356 have a marked influence on the binding. After binding, Trp-279 accommodates its side chain to better interact with the PET’s terminal phenyl group, disturbing CB1R residues communication. The interaction with Trp-356 might impair the activation of CB1R and can influence the binding of PET as a partial agonist. Understanding the PET association with CB1R from a molecular perspective can offer a glimpse of preventing potential toxicological or recreational effects since it is an attractive lead for drug development with fewer side effects than trans-THC.