American Chemical Society
ja991929q_si_001.pdf (177.78 kB)

Sequence and Stacking Dependence of 8-Oxoguanine Oxidation:  Comparison of One-Electron vs Singlet Oxygen Mechanisms

Download (177.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 1999-09-28, 00:00 authored by Robyn P. Hickerson, Ferran Prat, James G. Muller, Christopher S. Foote, Cynthia J. Burrows
The oxidation of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG)-containing oligodeoxynucleotides has been investigated using a variety of oxidants, including one-electron oxidants (Ir(IV), Fe(III), NiCR/KHSO5, and SO4-•) as well as singlet oxygen, generated both photochemically and thermally. The extents of oxidation in single-stranded and duplex oligodeoxynucleotides are compared, confirming theoretical ionization potentials of 8-oxoG in different sequence contexts in duplex DNA. As with guanine, 8-oxoG residues stacked in a duplex with a 3‘ neighboring G are more readily oxidized by one-electron oxidants than those stacked next to other bases, although the effect of stacking appears to be less pronounced for 8-oxoG than for G. Regardless of sequence, 8-oxoG is always more easily oxidized than the four natural nucleobases, even in the presence of multiple G sequences. Reactions with singlet molecular oxygen, thought to proceed through a cycloaddition mechanism, show little sequence selectivity and a 7-fold higher reactivity with single-stranded compared to duplex 8-oxoG residues. One-electron oxidants, such as Ir(IV) complexes, showed a more modest 3−4-fold higher reactivity with single-stranded DNA. In contrast, the Schiff base complex [NiCR]2+, used in conjunction with a strong oxidant, KHSO5, shows a 2-fold preference for oxidation of duplex vs single-stranded 8-oxoG, perhaps because of the high driving force and the possibility for competing G oxidation to equilibrate to 8-oxoG oxidation via hole transfer. Overall, these results point to subtle mechanistic differences in one-electron oxidation but a major distinction between one-electron and 1O2-mediated oxidation. Furthermore, they suggest an important role for 8-oxoG, not only as a product of oxidative DNA damage but also as a substrate for further oxidation.