posted on 2007-08-15, 00:00authored byNorbert V. Heeb, Markus Zennegg, Erika Gujer, Peter Honegger, Kerstin Zeyer, Urs Gfeller, Adrian Wichser, Martin Kohler, Peter Schmid, Lukas Emmenegger, Andrea Ulrich, Daniela Wenger, Jean-Luc Petermann, Jan Czerwinski, Thomas Mosimann, Markus Kasper, Andreas Mayer
Potential risks of a secondary formation of polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins/furans (PCDD/Fs) were assessed for two
cordierite-based, wall-through diesel particulate filters (DPFs)
for which soot combustion was either catalyzed with an
iron- or a copper-based fuel additive. A heavy duty diesel
engine was used as test platform, applying the eight-stage ISO 8178/4 C1 cycle. DPF applications neither affected
the engine performance, nor did they increase NO, NO2,
CO, and CO2 emissions. The latter is a metric for fuel
consumption. THC emissions decreased by about 40% when
deploying DPFs. PCDD/F emissions, with a focus on
tetra- to octachlorinated congeners, were compared under
standard and worst case conditions (enhanced chlorine
uptake). The iron-catalyzed DPF neither increased PCDD/F
emissions, nor did it change the congener pattern, even
when traces of chlorine became available. In case of copper,
PCDD/F emissions increased by up to 3 orders of magnitude
from 22 to 200 to 12 700 pg I-TEQ/L with fuels of <2,
14, and 110 μg/g chlorine, respectively. Mainly lower
chlorinated DD/Fs were formed. Based on these substantial
effects on PCDD/F emissions, the copper-catalyzed DPF
system was not approved for workplace applications, whereas
the iron system fulfilled all the specifications of the
Swiss procedures for DPF approval (VERT).