posted on 2016-04-05, 00:00authored byAngela
R. Harris, Amy J. Pickering, Michael Harris, Solaiman Doza, M. Sirajul Islam, Leanne Unicomb, Stephen Luby, Jennifer Davis, Alexandria B. Boehm
In
Dhaka, Bangladesh, the sensitivity and specificity of three
human, three ruminant, and one avian source-associated QPCR microbial
source tracking assays were evaluated using fecal samples collected
on site. Ruminant-associated assays performed well, whereas the avian
and human assays exhibited unacceptable cross-reactions with feces
from other hosts. Subsequently, child hand rinses (n = 44) and floor sponge samples (n = 44) from low-income-households
in Dhaka were assayed for fecal indicator bacteria (enterococci, Bacteroidales, and Escherichia coli) and a ruminant-associated bacterial target (BacR). Mean enterococci
concentrations were of 100 most probable number (MPN)/2 hands and
1000 MPN/225 cm2 floor. Mean concentrations of Bacteroidales were 106 copies/2 hands and 105 copies/225 cm2 floor. E. coli were detected in a quarter of hand rinse and floor samples. BacR
was detected in 18% of hand rinse and 27% of floor samples. Results
suggest that effective household fecal management should account not
only for human sources of contamination but also for animal sources.
The poor performance of the human-associated assays in the study area
calls into the question the feasibility of developing a human-associated
marker in urban slum environments, where domestic animals are exposed
to human feces that have been disposed in pits and open drains.