posted on 2016-01-04, 00:00authored byDavid
D. Hibbitts, David W. Flaherty, Enrique Iglesia
The
kinetic relevance and rates of elementary steps involved in
C–C bond hydrogenolysis for isobutane, neopentane, and 2,3-dimethylbutane
reactants were systematically probed using activation enthalpies and
free energies derived from density functional theory. Previous studies
showed that C–C cleavage in alkanes occurs via unsaturated
species formed in fast quasi-equilibrated C–H activation steps,
leading to rates that decrease with increasing H2 pressure,
because of a concomitant decrease in the concentration of the relevant
transition states. This study, together with previous findings for n-alkanes, provides a general mechanistic construct for
the analysis and prediction of C–C hydrogenolysis rates on
metals. C–C cleavage in alkanes is preceded by the loss of
two H atoms and the formation of two C-metal (C–M) bonds for
each 1C and 2C atom involved in the C–C
bond. Metal atoms transfer electrons into the 1C and 2C atoms as C–C bonds cleave and additional C–M
bonds form. 3C and 4C atoms of isobutane, neopentane,
and 2,3-dimethylbutane, however, do not lose H atoms before C–C
cleavage, and thus, transition states cannot bind the 3C and 4C atoms in the C–C bond being cleaved to
surface metal atoms. C–H activation occurs instead at 1C atoms vicinal to the C–C bond, which lose all H atoms
and form three C–M bonds. These transition states involve electron
transfer into the metal surface, leading to a net positive charge
at the 3C and 4C atoms; these atoms exhibit
sp2 geometry and resemble carbenium ions at the C–C
cleavage transition state, in which they are not bound to the metal
surface. These mechanistic features accurately describe measured H2 effects, activation enthalpies, and entropies, and furthermore,
they provide the molecular details required to understand and predict
the effects of temperature on hydrogenolysis rates and on the location
of C–C bond cleavage within a given alkane reagent. The result
shown and the conclusions reached are supported by rigorous theoretical
assessments for C–C cleavage within about 200 intermediates
on Ir surfaces, and the results appear to be applicable to other metals
(Rh, Ru, and Pt), which show kinetic behavior similar to Ir.