posted on 2021-10-27, 23:43authored byQing Ye, Jordan E. Krechmer, Joshua D. Shutter, Victoria P. Barber, Yaowei Li, Erik Helstrom, Lesly J. Franco, Joshua L. Cox, Amy I. H. Hrdina, Matthew B. Goss, Nadia Tahsini, Manjula Canagaratna, Frank N. Keutsch, Jesse H. Kroll
Levels of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) in the indoor environment
can be decreased by the use of “air cleaners”, devices
that remove VOCs by sorption and/or oxidative degradation. However,
efficacies of these technologies for removing VOCs tend to be poorly
constrained, as does the formation of oxidation byproducts. Here,
we examine the influence of several oxidation-based air cleaners,
specifically ones marketed as consumer-grade products, on the amounts
and composition of VOCs. Experiments were conducted in an environmental
chamber, with a suite of real-time analytical instruments to measure
direct emissions, VOC removal efficacies (by the addition of either
limonene and toluene), and byproduct formation. We find that the air
cleaners themselves can be a source of organic gases, that removal
efficacy can be exceedingly variable, and that VOC loss is primarily
driven by physical removal in some cleaners. When oxidative degradation
of VOCs was observed, it was accompanied by the formation of a range
of oxidation byproducts, including formaldehyde and other oxygenates.
These results indicate that some consumer-grade portable air cleaners
can be ineffective in removing VOCs and that the air delivered may
contain a range of organic compounds, due to direct emission and/or
byproduct formation.