posted on 2015-12-17, 05:31authored byLucas
M. Nathan, Megan Simmons, Benjamin J. Wegleitner, Christopher L. Jerde, Andrew R. Mahon
The
use of molecular surveillance techniques has become popular
among aquatic researchers and managers due to the improved sensitivity
and efficiency compared to traditional sampling methods. Rapid expansion
in the use of environmental DNA (eDNA), paired with the advancement
of molecular technologies, has resulted in new detection platforms
and techniques. In this study we present a comparison of three eDNA
surveillance platforms: traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR),
quantitative PCR (qPCR), and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in which
water samples were collected over a 24 h time period from mesocosm
experiments containing a population gradient of invasive species densities.
All platforms reliably detected the presence of DNA, even at low target
organism densities within the first hour. The two quantitative platforms
(qPCR and ddPCR) produced similar estimates of DNA concentrations.
The analyses completed with ddPCR was faster from sample collection
through analyses and cost approximately half the expenditure of qPCR.
Although a new platform for eDNA surveillance of aquatic species,
ddPCR was consistent with more commonly used qPCR and a cost-effective
means of estimating DNA concentrations. Use of ddPCR by researchers
and managers should be considered in future eDNA surveillance applications.