American Chemical Society
Browse

Pyramidal Dicationic Ge(II) Complexes with Homoleptic Neutral Pnictine Coordination: A Combined Experimental and Density Functional Theory Study

Download (835.29 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-28, 13:03 authored by Rhys P. King, Victoria K. Greenacre, William Levason, John M. Dyke, Gillian Reid
An unusual series of Ge­(II) dicationic species with homoleptic phosphine and arsine coordination, [Ge­(L)]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>, L = 3 × PMe<sub>3</sub>, triphos (MeC­(CH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>), triars (MeC­(CH<sub>2</sub>AsMe<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>), or κ<sup>3</sup>-tetraphos (P­(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>) (OTf<sup>–</sup> = O<sub>3</sub>SCF<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>) have been prepared by reaction of [GeCl<sub>2</sub>(dioxane)] with L and 2 mol equiv of Me<sub>3</sub>SiOTf in anhydrous CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (or MeCN for L = triars, triphos). X-ray crystal structures are reported for [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>, [Ge­(triars)]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>, and [Ge­(κ<sup>3</sup>-tetraphos)]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>, confirming homoleptic P<sub>3</sub>- or As<sub>3</sub>-coordination at Ge­(II) in each case and with the discrete OTf<sup>–</sup> anions providing a charge balance. The Ge–P/As bond lengths are significantly shorter than those in neutral germanium­(II) dihalide complexes with diphosphine or diarsine coordination. Solution NMR spectroscopic data indicate that the complexes are labile in solution. Using excess AsMe<sub>3</sub> and [GeCl<sub>2</sub>(dioxane)] gives only the neutral product, [Ge­(AsMe<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(OTf)<sub>2</sub>], the crystal structure of which shows four coordination at Ge­(II), via two As donor atoms and an O atom from two κ<sup>1</sup>-OTf<sup>–</sup> ligands; further weak, long-range intermolecular interactions give a chain polymer. The electronic structure of the [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> dication has been investigated using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The computed geometrical parameters for this dication are in good agreement with the experimental X-ray crystallographic values in [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>. The results also indicate that the pyramidal arrangement of the [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (computed P–Ge–P angle 96.8° at the B3LYP-D3 level) arises from a balance between electronic energy (<i>E</i><sub>elec</sub>) contributions, which favor a lower P–Ge–P angle, and nuclear–nuclear contributions (<i>E</i><sub>nn</sub>), which favor a higher P–Ge–P angle, to the total energy (<i>E</i><sub>TOT</sub>). An Atoms in Molecules (AIM) analysis reveals that one reason why <i>E</i><sub>elec</sub> decreases as the P–Ge–P angle decreases is because of C···H and H···H interactions between atoms on different CH<sub>3</sub> groups. The stability of the [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> dication is enhanced by the distribution of a significant part of the positive charge on Ge<sup>2+</sup> to the atomic centers of the PMe<sub>3</sub> ligands. Similar results were obtained for [Ge­(AsMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]­[OTf]<sub>2</sub>, showing the tris-AsMe<sub>3</sub> complex to be less stable compared to the PMe<sub>3</sub> analogue. Related calculations were also performed for the neutral [Ge­(PMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(OTf)<sub>2</sub>] and [Ge­(AsMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(OTf)<sub>2</sub>] complexes.

History