posted on 2022-01-05, 17:07authored byAbhinav
S. Raman, Aleksandra Vojvodic
The
stability and dissolution of rutile oxides such as RuO2 and IrO2 which are used as electrocatalysts for
water splitting have long been the Achilles’ heel in the long-term
operation of electrolyzers for sustainable production of hydrogen
from water. In this study, using a combination of ab initio steered
molecular dynamics, enhanced sampling, and ab initio thermodynamics,
we investigate the surface stability and dissolution of three prominent
electro(photo)catalysts for water splitting: RuO2, IrO2, and TiO2 in the rutile phase. We provide an atomistic
understanding of the dissolution process and establish possible dissolution
paths for different oxides using the (110) surface as a prototype.
Interestingly, we identify a distinct surface site specificity in
the dissolution of the RuO2(110) surface, with the coordinately
undersaturated sites more prone to dissolution, whereas no such surface
site specificity exists for the IrO2(110) surface. In addition,
our investigation of more complex dissolution mechanisms involving
codissolution of the different surface sites on the RuO2(110) surface reveals a hitherto unseen suppression of the dissolution
of Ru from the bridge sites caused by the codissolving coordinately
undersaturated sites. These findings provide routes to improving the
stability and a path toward understanding the activity–stability
conundrum in electrocatalytic water splitting.