posted on 2022-01-05, 17:07authored byAbhinav
S. Raman, Aleksandra Vojvodic
The
stability and dissolution of rutile oxides such as RuO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub> which are used as electrocatalysts for
water splitting have long been the Achilles’ heel in the long-term
operation of electrolyzers for sustainable production of hydrogen
from water. In this study, using a combination of ab initio steered
molecular dynamics, enhanced sampling, and ab initio thermodynamics,
we investigate the surface stability and dissolution of three prominent
electro(photo)catalysts for water splitting: RuO<sub>2</sub>, IrO<sub>2</sub>, and TiO<sub>2</sub> in the rutile phase. We provide an atomistic
understanding of the dissolution process and establish possible dissolution
paths for different oxides using the (110) surface as a prototype.
Interestingly, we identify a distinct surface site specificity in
the dissolution of the RuO<sub>2</sub>(110) surface, with the coordinately
undersaturated sites more prone to dissolution, whereas no such surface
site specificity exists for the IrO<sub>2</sub>(110) surface. In addition,
our investigation of more complex dissolution mechanisms involving
codissolution of the different surface sites on the RuO<sub>2</sub>(110) surface reveals a hitherto unseen suppression of the dissolution
of Ru from the bridge sites caused by the codissolving coordinately
undersaturated sites. These findings provide routes to improving the
stability and a path toward understanding the activity–stability
conundrum in electrocatalytic water splitting.