Partitioning to storage
fat is the major process for bioaccumulation
of many neutral organic chemicals. In this work, we evaluated the
performance of four predictive models, ABSOLV, COSMOtherm, KOWWIN,
and SPARC to calculate storage lipid–water partition coefficients.
In a first step of the validation, we used over 300 literature data
for chemicals with relatively simple molecular structures. For these
compounds the overall performance was similar for all models with
a root-mean-square error (rmse) between 0.45 and 0.61 log units. Clear
differences became visible in the second validation step where a subset
with only H-bond-donor compounds was used. Here, COSMOtherm and SPARC
performed clearly better with an rmse of 0.35 and 0.42 log units,
respectively, compared to ABSOLV and KOWWIN with an rmse of 0.91 and
0.85 log units, respectively. The last step in our validation was
a comparison with experimental values for 22 complex, multifunctional
chemicals (including pesticides, hormones, mycotoxins) that we measured
specifically for this validation purpose. For these chemicals, predictions
by all models were less accurate than those for simpler chemicals.
COSMOtherm performed the best (rmse 0.71 log units) while the other
methods showed considerably poorer results (rmse 1.29 (ABSOLV), 1.25
(SPARC), and 1.62 (KOWWIN) log units).