Physical Property
Responses of Shale Matrix and Its
Surrounding Rocks to CO<sub>2</sub>/Oxy-Coal Combustion Flue Gas Exposure:
Implications for Fluid Storage Stability Assessment
To preliminarily validate the storage stability of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<i><sub><i>x</i></sub></i> within gas-bearing shale reservoirs, one representative
shale and
its surrounding rocks were exposed to CO<sub>2</sub>/flue gas at 30
MPa and 353.15 K for 60 days, and changes in their physical properties
were investigated. Results indicated that the CO<sub>2</sub>/flue
gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure raised sample complexity via mineral
dissolution and precipitation. Mineral dissolution increased micropores
of the roof rock, while precipitation decreased micropores of the
shale and floor rock and mesopores of all samples. Thereinto, the
flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure demonstrated higher influential
degrees than those of the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure.
Furthermore, the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure enlarged
macropores of the surrounding rocks but narrowed those of the shale.
The flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposure oppositely affects macropores
as the does, which is more conducive for fluid storage. Although
the CO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O and flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O exposures transformed small-scale pores into medium- and
large-scale pores/fractures, they reduced sample permeability by 62.51–86.43%
and 65.47–90.21%, respectively. Such phenomena suggested stronger
flue gas–H<sub>2</sub>O–shale interactions and a better
sealing capability of the surrounding rocks for flue gas than for
CO<sub>2</sub>. Overall, flue gas can react with shale/surrounding
rocks more intensively than CO<sub>2</sub>, making shale reservoirs
a promising geologic formation for the stable storage of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<i><sub><i>x</i></sub></i>.