posted on 2024-02-29, 18:37authored byWilliam
R. Borrelli, Kenneth J. Mei, Sanghyun J. Park, Benjamin J. Schwartz
Different simulation models of the hydrated electron
produce different
solvation structures, but it has been challenging to determine which
simulated solvation structure, if any, is the most comparable to experiment.
In a recent
work, Neupane et al. [J. Phys. Chem. B2023, 127, 5941–5947] showed using Kirkwood–Buff theory
that the partial molar volume of the hydrated electron, which is known
experimentally, can be readily computed from an integral over the
simulated electron–water radial distribution function. This
provides a sensitive way to directly compare the hydration structure
of different simulation models of the hydrated electron with experiment.
Here, we compute the partial molar volume of an ab-initio-simulated
hydrated electron model based on density-functional theory (DFT) with
a hybrid functional at different simulated system sizes. We find that
the partial molar volume of the DFT-simulated hydrated electron is
not converged with respect to the system size for simulations with
up to 128 waters. We show that even at the largest simulation sizes,
the partial molar volume of DFT-simulated hydrated electrons is underestimated
by a factor of 2 with respect to experiment, and at the standard 64-water
size commonly used in the literature, DFT-based simulations underestimate
the experimental solvation volume by a factor of ∼3.5. An extrapolation
to larger box sizes does predict the experimental partial molar volume
correctly; however, larger system sizes than those explored here are
currently intractable without the use of machine-learned potentials.
These results bring into question what aspects of the predicted hydrated
electron radial distribution function, as calculated by DFT-based
simulations with the PBEh-D3 functional, deviate from the true solvation
structure.