American Chemical Society
Browse

P···N Pnicogen Bonds in Cationic Complexes of F<sub>4</sub>P<sup>+</sup> and F<sub>3</sub>HP<sup>+</sup> with Nitrogen Bases

Download (1014.36 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-03-26, 00:00 authored by Janet E. Del Bene, Ibon Alkorta, José Elguero
Ab initio MP2/aug’-cc-pVTZ calculations have been carried out on cationic pnicogen-bonded complexes F<sub>4</sub>P<sup>+</sup>:N-base and F<sub>3</sub>HP<sup>+</sup>:N-base, with linear F<sub>ax</sub>–P···N and H<sub>ax</sub>-P···N, respectively. The bases include the sp<sup>3</sup>-hybridized nitrogen bases NH<sub>3</sub>, NClH<sub>2</sub>, NFH<sub>2</sub>, NCl<sub>2</sub>H, NCl<sub>3</sub>, NFCl<sub>2</sub>, NF<sub>2</sub>H, NF<sub>2</sub>Cl, and NF<sub>3</sub>, and the sp bases NCNH<sub>2</sub>, NCCH<sub>3</sub>, NP, NCOH, NCCl, NCH, NCF, NCCN, and N<sub>2</sub>. The binding energies of these complexes span a wide range, from −15 to −180 kJ mol<sup>–1</sup>, as do the P–N distances, which vary from 1.89 to 3.11 Å. There is a gap in the P–N distances between 2.25 and 2.53 Å in which no complexes are found. Thus, the equilibrium complexes may be classified as inner or outer complexes based on the value of the P–N distance. Inner complexes have P···N bonds with varying degrees of covalent character, whereas outer complexes are stabilized by intermolecular P···N bonds with little or no covalency. Charge-transfer stabilizes these pnicogen-bonded complexes. For complexes F<sub>4</sub>P<sup>+</sup>:N-base, the dominant charge-transfer interaction is from the lone pair on N to the σ*P–F<sub>ax</sub> orbital. In addition, there are three other charge-transfer interactions from the lone pair on N to the σ*P–F<sub>eq</sub> orbitals, which taken together, are more stabilizing than the interaction involving σ*P–F<sub>ax</sub>. In contrast, the dominant charge-transfer interaction for complexes F<sub>3</sub>HP<sup>+</sup>:N-base is from the lone pair on N to the σ*P–F<sub>eq</sub> orbitals. Computed EOM-CCSD Fermi-contact terms are excellent approximations to the total spin–spin coupling constants <sup>1p</sup><i>J</i>(P–N) and <sup>1</sup><i>J</i>(P–H<sub>ax</sub>), but are poor approximations to <sup>1</sup><i>J</i>(P–F<sub>ax</sub>). <sup>1p</sup><i>J</i>(P–N) values increase with decreasing P–N distance, approach a maximum, and then decrease and change sign as the P–N distance further decreases and the pnicogen bond acquires increased covalency. <sup>1</sup><i>J</i>(P–F<sub>ax</sub>) values for F<sub>4</sub>P<sup>+</sup>:N-base complexes increase with decreasing distance. Although the P–H<sub>ax</sub> distance changes very little in complexes F<sub>3</sub>HP<sup>+</sup>:N-base, patterns exist which suggest that changes in <sup>1</sup><i>J</i>(P–H<sub>ax</sub>) reflect the hybridization of the nitrogen base and whether the complex is an inner or outer complex.

History