posted on 2021-05-27, 18:41authored byDerek Johnson, Robert Heltzel
Understanding
methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain
continues to be of interest. Previous studies identified that measurements
are skewed due to “super-emitters”, and recently, researchers
identified temporal variability as another contributor to discrepancies
among studies. We focused on the latter by performing 17 methane audits
at a single production site over 4 years, from 2016 to 2020. Source
detection was similar to Method 21 but augmented with accurate methane
mass rate quantification. Audit results varied from ∼78 g/h
to over 43 kg/h with a mean emissions rate of 4.2 kg/h and a geometric
mean of 821 g/h. Such high variability sheds light that even quarterly
measurement programs will likely yield highly variable results. Total
emissions were typically dominated by those from the produced water
storage tank. Of 213 sources quantified, a single tank measurement
represented 60% of the cumulative emission rate. Measurements were
separated into four categories: wellheads (n = 78),
tank (n = 17), enclosed gas process units (n = 31), and others (n = 97). Each subgroup
of measurements was skewed and fat-tailed, with the skewness ranging
from 2.4 to 5.7 and kurtosis values ranging from 6.5 to 33.7. Analyses
found no significant correlations between methane emissions and temperature,
whole gas production, or water production. Since measurement results
were highly variable and daily production values were known, we completed
a Monte Carlo analysis to estimate average throughput-normalized methane
emissions which yielded an estimate of 0.093 ± 0.013%.