posted on 2024-07-26, 12:41authored byHenock
M. Deberneh, Michael E. Taylor, Agnieszka K. Borowik, Masaru Miyagi, Benjamin F. Miller, Rovshan G. Sadygov
Labeling with deuterium oxide (D<sub>2</sub>O) has emerged
as one
of the preferred approaches for measuring the synthesis of individual
proteins in vivo. In these experiments, the synthesis rates of proteins
are determined by modeling mass shifts in peptides during the labeling
period. This modeling depends on a theoretical maximum enrichment
determined by the number of labeling sites (<i>N</i><sub>EH</sub>) of each amino acid in the peptide sequence. Currently, <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> is determined from one set of published values.
However, it has been demonstrated that <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> can differ between species and potentially tissues. The goal of
this work was to determine the number of <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> for each amino acid within a given experiment to capture the conditions
unique to that experiment. We used four methods to compute the <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> values. To test these approaches, we used
two publicly available data sets. In a <i>de novo</i> approach,
we compute <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> values and the label enrichment
from the abundances of three mass isotopomers. The other three methods
use the complete isotope profiles and body water enrichment in deuterium
as an input parameter. They determine the <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> values by (1) minimizing the residual sum of squares, (2) from the
mole percent excess of labeling, and (3) the time course profile of
the depletion of the relative isotope abundance of monoisotope. In
the test samples, the method using residual sum of squares performed
the best. The methods are implemented in a tool for determining the <i>N</i><sub>EH</sub> for each amino acid within a given experiment
to use in the determination of protein synthesis rates using D<sub>2</sub>O.