New Understanding on Regulating the Crystallization
and Morphology of the β‑Polymorph of Isotactic Polypropylene
Based on Carboxylate–Alumoxane Nucleating Agents
posted on 2016-03-01, 14:33authored byMohan
Raj Mani, Ramesh Chellaswamy, Yogesh N. Marathe, Vijayamohanan K. Pillai
Carboxylate–alumoxane derived
from p-n-alkylbenzoic
acids, where n-alkyl group changes from 2 to 8 carbon
atoms, exhibits dual nucleating ability and nucleates isotactic polypropylene
(iPP) into predominantly in the β-phase under specific conditions.
The selectivity of the β-phase nucleation depends on the concentration
of the nucleating agent, end melting temperature and cooling rate.
The β-phase obtained from p-n-alkylbenzoate–alumoxanes
is compared with the β-phase obtained from calcium pimelate
(CaP), an efficient β-phase selective nucleating agent, using
the results from DSC, WAXS, and SAXS analysis. The lamellar morphology
of iPP nucleated with different nucleating agents crystallized at
different crystallization temperatures (TC) under controlled nonisothermal conditions are evaluated using SAXS
analysis. The long period increases with increasing crystallization
temperature and the long period of the β-phase is always larger
than that of the α-phase for a given crystallization temperature.
Furthermore, the variation of long period with crystallization temperature
clearly brings out two crystallization temperature ranges; the low
temperature range and the high temperature range. However, the β-phase
shows a lower changeover temperature compared to that of the α-phase.
The one-dimensional correlation analysis of the β-phase shows
that the thickness of the crystal lamellae (lc) increases
with TC and exhibits the low and high
crystallization temperature ranges, while the thickness of the amorphous
layer (la) more or less remains constant. In-situ high temperature WAXS studies capture the β-phase
to the α-phase transition and the transformed material correlates
well with the lamellar thickness of the β-phase. The morphological
difference between the α- and the β-phases are discussed
and attributed to the differences in the impact properties and the
melting temperature. This study clearly demonstrates that the lamellar
morphology mainly depends on the TC and
not on the nature of the nucleating agents.