posted on 2022-09-20, 03:03authored byGabrielle Foran, Adrien Mery, Marc Bertrand, Steeve Rousselot, David Lepage, David Aymé-Perrot, Mickaël Dollé
Despite their high conductivity, factors such as being
fragile
enough to face processing issues and interfacial incompatibility with
lithium electrodes are some of the main drawbacks hindering the commercialization
of inorganic (mainly oxide-based) solid electrolytes for use in all-solid-state
lithium batteries. To this end, strategies such as the addition of
solid polymer electrolytes have been proposed to improve the electrode–electrolyte
interface. Hybrid electrolytes, which are usually composed of ceramic
particles dispersed in a polymer, generally have a better affinity
with electrodes and higher ionic conductivity than pure inorganic
electrolytes. However, a significant downside of this strategy is
that differences in lithium transportability between electrolyte layers
can result in the formation of a high interfacial energy barrier across
the cell. One strategy to ensure sufficient “wetting”
of ceramics is to incorporate a liquid electrolyte directly into the
solid inorganic electrolyte resulting in the formation of a hybrid
liquid–ceramic electrolyte. To this end, liquid–ceramic
hybrid electrolytes were prepared by adding LiG4TFSI, a
solvate ionic liquid (SIL), to garnet, NASICON, and perovskite-type
ceramic electrolytes. Although SIL addition resulted in increased
ionic conductivity, comparisons between the pure SIL and the hybrid
systems revealed that improvements were due to the SIL alone. A thorough
investigation of the hybrid systems by solid-state nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) revealed little to no lithium exchange between the
ceramic and the SIL. This confirms that lithium conductivity preferentially
occurs through the SIL in these hybrid systems. The primary role of
the ceramic is to provide mechanical strength.