posted on 2005-09-15, 00:00authored byThomas J. Schröder, Tjisse Hiemstra, Jos P. M. Vink, Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee
The aim of this study is to predict the solid−solution
partitioning of heavy metals in river flood plain soils. We
compared mechanistic geochemical modeling with a statistical
approach. To characterize the heavy metal contamination
of embanked river flood plain soils in The Netherlands,
we collected 194 soil samples at 133 sites distributed in the
Dutch part of the Rhine and Meuse river systems. We
measured the total amounts of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and
Zn in the soil samples and the metal fraction extractable
by 2.5 mM CaCl2. We found a strong correlation between
heavy metal contamination and organic matter content,
which was almost identical for both river systems. Speciation
calculations by a fully parametrized model showed the
strengths and weaknesses of the mechanistic approach.
Cu and Cd concentrations were predicted within one log
scale, whereas modeling of Zn and Pb needs adjustment of
some model parameters. The statistical fitting approach
produced better results but is limited with regard to the
understanding it provides. The log RMSE for this approach
varied between 0.2 and 0.32 for the different metals. The
careful modeling of speciation and adsorption processes is
a useful tool for the investigation and understanding of
metal availability in river flood plain soils.