la9b03248_si_001.pdf (1.27 MB)
Download fileModeling Enantiomeric Separations as an Interfacial Process Using Amylose Tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate) (ADMPC) Polymers Coated on Amorphous Silica
journal contribution
posted on 2020-01-30, 16:35 authored by Xiaoyu Wang, Cynthia J. Jameson, Sohail MuradChiral
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is commonly
performed to isolate the biologically active enantiomer of a drug
from the ineffective or even harmful ones. Understanding the molecular-level
recognition that underlies this process is necessary for trimming
down the very large number of possible combinations of chiral stationary
phases, solvent systems, and other experimental HPLC conditions, a
particularly important consideration when only small quantities of
the racemate are available. Fully atomistic molecular dynamics (MD)
simulation is a useful tool to provide this molecular-level understanding
and predict experimental separation factors under a given set of conditions.
To predict the chiral separation results for drug enantiomers by amylose
tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl carbamate) (ADMPC) chiral stationary phase,
we design a model of multiple ADMPC polymer strands coated on an amorphous
silica slab. Using various MD techniques, we successfully coat ADMPCs
onto the surface without losing the structural character of the backbone
in the presence of the solvent system. Not only is this model more
representative of the polymer surface on a solid support that is encountered
by the enantiomers, but it also provides more opportunities for chiral
molecules interacting with ADMPC, provides the possibility for large
drug molecules to interact with two polymer strands at the same instant,
and provides better agreement with experiment when we use the overall
average quantities as the predictive metric. For a better understanding
of why some metrics are better predictors than others, we use charts
of the distribution of hydrogen-bonding lifetimes for various donor–acceptor
pairs that contribute to the interaction events determining the relative
retention times for the enantiomers. We also examine the contribution
of ring–ring interactions to the molecular recognition process
and ultimately to the differential retention of enantiomers. The results
are more consistent than previous models and resolve the problematic
case of two drugs, thalidomide and valsartan.
History
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
Keywords
Polymers Coatedmolecular-level recognitionhydrogen-bonding lifetimesdrug moleculesinteraction eventsmodeling Enantiomeric Separationsdrug enantiomerschiral moleculescarbamatechiral separation resultsHPLC conditionsMD techniquesInterfacial Processcoat ADMPCsmolecular-level understandingphaserecognition processquantityuse chartsAmorphous Silica Chiralseparation factorsretention timessilica slabpolymer surfaceADMPC polymer strandspolymer strands