ja508192y_si_001.pdf (893.95 kB)
Download fileMechanistic Contrasts between Manganese and Rhenium Bipyridine Electrocatalysts for the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
journal contribution
posted on 2014-11-19, 00:00 authored by Christoph Riplinger, Matthew
D. Sampson, Andrew M. Ritzmann, Clifford P. Kubiak, Emily A. Carter[Re(bpy)(CO)3]− is a well-established
homogeneous electrocatalyst for the reduction of CO2 to
CO. Recently, substitution of the more abundant transition metal Mn
for Re yielded a similarly active electrocatalyst, [Mn(bpy)(CO)3]−. Compared to the Re catalyst, this Mn
catalyst operates at a lower applied reduction potential but requires
the presence of a weak acid in the solution for catalytic activity.
In this study, we employ quantum chemistry combined with continuum
solvation and microkinetics to examine the mechanism of CO2 reduction by each catalyst. We use cyclic voltammetry experiments
to determine the turnover frequencies of the Mn catalyst with phenol
as the added weak acid. The computed turnover frequencies for both
catalysts agree to within one order of magnitude of the experimental
ones. The different operating potentials for these catalysts indicate
that different reduction pathways may be favored during catalysis.
We model two different pathways for both catalysts and find that,
at their respective operating potentials, the Mn catalyst indeed is
predicted to take a different reaction route than the Re catalyst.
The Mn catalyst can access both catalytic pathways, depending on the
applied potential, while the Re catalyst does not show this flexibility.
Our microkinetics analysis predicts which intermediates should be
observable during catalysis. These intermediates for the two catalyzed
reactions have qualitatively different electronic configurations,
depending on the applied potential. The observable intermediate at
higher applied potentials possesses an unpaired electron and therefore
should be EPR-active; however, the observable intermediate at lower
applied potentials, accessible only for the Mn catalyst, is diamagnetic
and therefore should be EPR-silent. The differences between both catalysts
are rationalized on the basis of their electronic structure and different
ligand binding affinities.