posted on 2014-01-03, 00:00authored byIlya D. Gridnev, Yuanyuan Liu, Tsuneo Imamoto
The mechanism of asymmetric hydrogenation
of five representative
β-dehydroamino acids catalyzed by rhodium complexes of (R)-(tert-butylmethylphosphino)(di-tert-butylphosphino)methane (trichickenfootphos, TCFP) and
(R,R)-1,2-bis(tert-butylmethylphosphino)benzene (BenzP*) was studied through a combination
of extensive NMR experiments and state-of-the-art DFT computations
in order to reveal the crucial factors governing the sense and order
of enantioselectivity in this industrially important reaction. The
binding mode of the substrate with a Rh(I) catalyst was found to be
highly dependent on the nature of the rhodium complex and the substrate.
Thus, no substrate binding was detected for [Rh((R,R)-BenzP*)S2]+SbF6– (5) and (E)-3-acetylamino-2-butenoate
(2a) even at 173 K. [Rh((R)-TCFP) S2]+BF4– (3) exhibited weak reversible binding with 2a in the temperature
interval 173–253 K with the formation of complex 4a, whereas at ambient temperature, slow isomerization of 2a to (Z)-3-acetylamino-2-butenoate (2b) took place. The investigations with a total of 10 combinations
of the catalysts and substrates demonstrated various binding modes
that did not affect significantly the enantioselectivities observed
in corresponding catalytic reactions and in low temperature hydrogenations
of the catalyst–substrate complexes. The monohydride intermediate 10 formed quantitatively when the equilibrium mixture of 2a, 3, and 4a was hydrogenated at
173 K. Its molecular structure including relative stereochemistry
was determined by NMR experiments. These results together with the
stereochemichal outcome of the low-temperature hydrogenation (99.2%
ee, R) and DFT calculations led to the reasonable
reaction pathway of the asymmetric hydrogenation of 2a catalyzed by 3. The conceivable catalytic pathways
were computed for five combinations of the BenzP*-Rh catalyst and
prochiral β-dehydroamino acids 2a,b and 21–23. In most cases, it was found that the pathways
involving the hydrogenation of Rh(I) square planar chelate complexes
are usually higher in free energy than the pathways with the hydrogen
activation prior to the chelate formation. Computed differences in
the free energies of the transition states for the double bond coordination
stage of the R and S pathways reasonably
well reproduce the optical yields observed experimentally in the corresponding
catalytic reactions and in the low temperature hydrogenation experiments.
To explain extremely high ee’s (>99% ee) in some of the
hydrogenations,
it is necessary to analyze in more detail the participation of the
solvent in the enantiodetermining step.