posted on 2016-02-20, 01:40authored byAdam S. Pollard, Timothy J. Taylor, Lora E. Fleming, Will Stahl-Timmins, Michael H. Depledge, Nicholas J. Osborne
Increasing greenhouse gas emissions threaten human health
and the
environment. In response, healthcare managers face significant challenges
in balancing operational decisions about patient care with carbon
mitigation targets. We explore a bottom-up modeling framework to aid
in the decision-making for both carbon and cost in healthcare, using
data from a case study in Cornwall, UK. A model was built and run
for secondary healthcare, specifically outpatient clinics, theater
lists, beds, and diagnostic facilities. Five scenarios were tested:
business-as-usual; service expansion; site closure; water temperature
reduction; and theater optimization. The estimated emissions from
secondary healthcare in Cornwall ran to 5787 T CO2eq with
patient travel adding 2215 T CO2eq. Closing selected sites
would have reduced this by 4% (261 T CO2eq), a reduction
less than the resulting increases in patient transport emissions.
Reducing hot water temperatures by 5 °C and improving theater
usage would lower the footprint by 0.7% (44 T CO2eq) and
0.08% (5 T CO2eq), respectively. We consider bottom-up
models important tools in the process of estimating and modeling the
carbon footprint of healthcare. For the carbon reduction targets of
the healthcare sector to be met, the use of these bottom-up models
in decision making and forward planning is pivotal.