posted on 2015-12-17, 05:31authored byDavid A. Dawson, Phil Purnell, Katy Roelich, Jonathan Busch, Julia K. Steinberger
Renewable
energy technologies, necessary for low-carbon infrastructure
networks, are being adopted to help reduce fossil fuel dependence
and meet carbon mitigation targets. The evolution of these technologies
has progressed based on the enhancement of technology-specific performance
criteria, without explicitly considering the wider system (global)
impacts. This paper presents a methodology for simultaneously assessing
local (technology) and global (infrastructure) performance, allowing
key technological interventions to be evaluated with respect to their
effect on the vulnerability of wider infrastructure systems. We use
exposure of low carbon infrastructure to critical material supply
disruption (criticality) to demonstrate the methodology. A series
of local performance changes are analyzed; and by extension of this
approach, a method for assessing the combined criticality of multiple
materials for one specific technology is proposed. Via a case study
of wind turbines at both the material (magnets) and technology (turbine
generators) levels, we demonstrate that analysis of a given intervention
at different levels can lead to differing conclusions regarding the
effect on vulnerability. Infrastructure design decisions should take
a systemic approach; without these multilevel considerations, strategic
goals aimed to help meet low-carbon targets, that is, through long-term
infrastructure transitions, could be significantly jeopardized.