es6b01817_si_001.pdf (843.67 kB)
Download fileLondon Hybrid Exposure Model: Improving Human Exposure Estimates to NO2 and PM2.5 in an Urban Setting
journal contribution
posted on 2016-10-06, 00:00 authored by James David Smith, Christina Mitsakou, Nutthida Kitwiroon, Ben M. Barratt, Heather A. Walton, Jonathon G. Taylor, Hugh Ross Anderson, Frank
J. Kelly, Sean D. BeeversHere we describe
the development of the London Hybrid Exposure Model (LHEM), which
calculates exposure of the Greater London population to outdoor air
pollution sources, in-buildings, in-vehicles, and outdoors, using
survey data of when and where people spend their time. For comparison
and to estimate exposure misclassification we compared Londoners LHEM
exposure with exposure at the residential address, a commonly used
exposure metric in epidemiological research. In 2011, the mean annual
LHEM exposure to outdoor sources was estimated to be 37% lower for
PM2.5 and 63% lower for NO2 than at the residential
address. These decreased estimates reflect the effects of reduced
exposure indoors, the amount of time spent indoors (∼95%),
and the mode and duration of travel in London. We find that an individual’s
exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 outside their residential
address is highly correlated (Pearson’s R of
0.9). In contrast, LHEM exposure estimates for PM2.5 and
NO2 suggest that the degree of correlation is influenced
by their exposure in different transport modes. Further development
of the LHEM has the potential to increase the understanding of exposure
error and bias in time-series and cohort studies and thus better distinguish
the independent effects of NO2 and PM2.5.