posted on 2015-04-07, 00:00authored bySami G. Al-Ghamdi, Melissa M. Bilec
This
research investigates the relationship between energy use,
geographic location, life cycle environmental impacts, and Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). The researchers studied
worldwide variations in building energy use and associated life cycle
impacts in relation to the LEED rating systems. A Building Information
Modeling (BIM) of a reference 43 000 ft2 office
building was developed and situated in 400 locations worldwide while
making relevant changes to the energy model to meet reference codes,
such as ASHRAE 90.1. Then life cycle environmental and human health
impacts from the buildings’ energy consumption were calculated.
The results revealed considerable variations between sites in the
U.S. and international locations (ranging from 394 ton CO2 equiv to 911 ton CO2 equiv, respectively). The variations
indicate that location specific results, when paired with life cycle
assessment, can be an effective means to achieve a better understanding
of possible adverse environmental impacts as a result of building
energy consumption in the context of green building rating systems.
Looking at these factors in combination and using a systems approach
may allow rating systems like LEED to continue to drive market transformation
toward sustainable development, while taking into consideration both
energy sources and building efficiency.