posted on 2022-03-23, 18:04authored byVladimir L. Meca, Rafael d’Amore-Domenech, Antonio Crucelaegui, Teresa J. Leo
For
the first time, a comparative economic study between liquid
hydrogen and methanol as hydrogen vectors for the bulk transport of
hydrogen at sea has been performed. The objective of this study is
to gain insight on whether it is cost-effective to produce green hydrogen
locally or, instead, import it from another location overseas featuring
lower costs of renewable energy. In addition, this study aims to determine
the break-even point at which the hydrogen transport alternatives,
covered in this study, become more inexpensive. The alternatives covered
include the seaborne transport of liquid hydrogen or methanol with
the reconversion to hydrogen at the destination through methanol electrolysis
or a steam-reforming process. Three different production mass flow
rates of hydrogen at the origin are explored, 100 kt/y, 1 Mt/y, and
10 Mt/y, in regard to three representative routes: Brazil–Spain,
Brazil–The Netherlands, and Australia–Japan. The findings
of this study suggest that for the production of hydrogen at 1 Mt/y
with an electricity cost of 40 USD/MWh, liquid hydrogen is the cheapest
alternative with a levelized cost of hydrogen at the destination of
approximately 2 USD/kg for all of the explored routes. If the synthesized
e-methanol reaching the import destination is directly used as an
energy vector, the levelized cost of energy contained in this e-methanol
practically coincides with that of liquid hydrogen at a mass flow
rate of 10 Mt/y at the origin.