American Chemical Society
Browse
ja0439470_si_002.pdf (1.75 MB)

IrII(ethene):  Metal or Carbon Radical?

Download (1.75 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2005-02-16, 00:00 authored by Dennis G. H. Hetterscheid, Jasper Kaiser, Eduard Reijerse, Theo P. J. Peters, Simone Thewissen, Arno N. J. Blok, Jan M. M. Smits, René de Gelder, Bas de Bruin
One-electron oxidation of [(Mentpa)IrI(ethene)]+ complexes (Me3tpa = N,N,N-tri(6-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)amine; Me2tpa = N-(2-pyridylmethyl)-N,N,-di[(6-methyl-2-pyridyl)methyl]-amine) results in relatively stable, five-coordinate IrII−olefin species [(Mentpa)IrII(ethene)]2+ (12+:  n = 3; 22+:  n = 2). These contain a “vacant site” at iridium and a “non-innocent” ethene fragment, allowing radical type addition reactions at both the metal and the ethene ligand. The balance between metal- and ligand-centered radical behavior is influenced by the donor capacity of the solvent. In weakly coordinating solvents, 12+ and 22+ behave as moderately reactive metallo-radicals. Radical coupling of 12+ with NO in acetone occurs at the metal, resulting in dissociation of ethene and formation of the stable nitrosyl complex [(Me3tpa)Ir(NO)]2+ (62+). In the coordinating solvent MeCN, 12+ generates more reactive radicals; [(Me3tpa)Ir(MeCN)(ethene)]2+ (92+) by MeCN coordination, and [(Me3tpa)IrII(MeCN)]2+ (102+) by substitution of MeCN for ethene. Complex 102+ is a metallo-radical, like 12+ but more reactive. DFT calculations indicate that 92+ is intermediate between the slipped-olefin IrII(CH2CH2) and ethyl radical IrIII−CH2−CH2· resonance structures, of which the latter prevails. The ethyl radical character of 92+ allows radical type addition reactions at the ethene ligand. Complex 22+ behaves similarly in MeCN. In the absence of further reagents, 12+ and 22+ convert to the ethylene bridged species [(Mentpa)(MeCN)IrIII2-C2H4)IrIII(MeCN)(Me3tpa)]4+ (n = 3:  34+; n = 2:  44+) in MeCN. In the presence of TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxo), formation of 34+ from 12+ in MeCN is completely suppressed and only [(Me3tpa)IrIII(TEMPO-)(MeCN)]2+ (72+) is formed. This is thought to proceed via radical coupling of TEMPO at the metal center of 102+. In the presence of water, hydrolysis of the coordinated acetonitrile fragment of 72+ results in the acetamido complex [(Me3tpa)IrIII(NHC(O)CH3))(TEMPOH)]2+ (82+).

History