Strontium
tantalum oxynitrides were prepared within the nominal composition
range of 1.0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 2.0, where <i>x</i> = Sr/Ta atomic ratio. A gradual structural transition
was observed between the perovskite SrTaO<sub>2</sub>N and the Ruddlesden–Popper
phase Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N with increasing SrO content.
X-ray diffraction analyses showed that a single-phase perovskite was
obtained up to <i>x</i> = 1.1, after which Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N gradually appeared at <i>x</i> ≥
1.25. High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy observations
identified the gradual intergrowth of a Ruddlesden–Popper Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N type planar structure interwoven with the
perovskite crystal lattice upon increasing <i>x</i>. The
crystal lattice at <i>x</i> = 1.4 was highly defective and
consisted primarily of perovskite intergrown with a large amount of
the Ruddlesden–Popper phase structure. This Ruddlesden–Popper
phase layer intergrowth is a characteristic of an oxynitride perovskite
rather than the Ruddlesden–Popper defects previously reported
in oxide perovskites. Partial substitution of Ta with Sr was also
evident in this perovskite lattice. Just below <i>x</i> =
2, a perovskite-type structure was intergrown as defects in the Ruddlesden–Popper
Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N. Characterization of Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N in ambient air was challenging due to its moisture
sensitivity. Thermal analysis demonstrated that this material was
relatively stable up to approximately 1400 °C in comparison with
SrTaO<sub>2</sub>N perovskite, especially under nitrogen. Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N could keep its structure in a sealed tube, and some
amount of SrCO<sub>3</sub> was observed in XRD after 10 days of exposure
to 75% relative humidity under prior ambient conditions. A compact
of this material had a relative density of 96% after sintering at
1400 °C under 0.2 MPa of nitrogen, even though a drastic loss
of nitrogen was previously reported for a SrTaO<sub>2</sub>N perovskite
under these same conditions. Postammonolysis of the Sr<sub>2</sub>TaO<sub>3</sub>N ceramics was not required prior to studying its
dielectric behavior. This is in contrast to the SrTaO<sub>2</sub>N
perovskite, which requires postammonolysis to recover its stoichiometric
composition and electrical insulating properties.