posted on 2012-03-06, 00:00authored byAlissa Kendall, Lindsay Price
Beginning with model year 2012, light-duty vehicles sold
in the
U.S. are subject to new rules that regulate tailpipe greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions based on grams of CO2–equivalent
per mile (gCO2e/mi). However, improvements in vehicle technology,
lower-carbon fuels, and improvements in GHG accounting practices which
account for distortions related to emissions timing all contribute
to shifting a greater portion of life cycle emissions away from the
vehicle use phase and toward the vehicle production phase. This article
proposes methods for calculating time-corrected life cycle emissions
intensity on a gCO2e/mi basis and explores whether regulating
only tailpipe CO2 could lead to an undesirable regulatory
outcome, where technologies and vehicle architectures with higher
life cycle GHGs are favored over technologies with lower life cycle
emissions but with higher tailpipe GHG emissions. Two life cycle GHG
assessments for future vehicles are presented in addition to time
correction factors for production and end-of-life GHG emissions. Results
demonstrate that, based on the vehicle designs considered here, there
is a potential for favoring vehicles with higher life cycle emissions
if only tailpipe emissions are regulated; moreover, the application
of time correction factors amplifies the importance of production
emissions and the potential for a perverse outcome.