Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale
journal contributionposted on 27.01.2020, 17:37 by Jianzhao Bi, Avani Wildani, Howard H. Chang, Yang Liu
Low-cost air quality sensors are promising supplements to regulatory monitors for PM2.5 exposure assessment. However, little has been done to incorporate the low-cost sensor measurements in large-scale PM2.5 exposure modeling. We conducted spatially varying calibration and developed a downweighting strategy to optimize the use of low-cost sensor data in PM2.5 estimation. In California, PurpleAir low-cost sensors were paired with air quality system (AQS) regulatory stations, and calibration of the sensors was performed by geographically weighted regression. The calibrated PurpleAir measurements were then given lower weights according to their residual errors and fused with AQS measurements into a random forest model to generate 1 km daily PM2.5 estimates. The calibration reduced PurpleAir’s systematic bias to ∼0 μg/m3 and residual errors by 36%. Increased sensor bias was found to be associated with higher temperature and humidity, as well as longer operating time. The weighted prediction model outperformed the AQS-based prediction model with an improved random cross-validation (CV) R2 of 0.86, an improved spatial CV R2 of 0.81, and a lower prediction error. The temporal CV R2 did not improve due to the temporal discontinuity of PurpleAir. The inclusion of PurpleAir data allowed the predictions to better reflect PM2.5 spatial details and hotspots.
Read the peer-reviewed publication
High-Resolution PM 2.5 ModelingIncorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurementsforest modeldownweighting strategyPM 2.5 estimatessensor bias1 kmPM 2.5 estimationPM 2.5 exposure modelingR 2AQS measurementsScale Low-cost air quality sensorsPM 2.5prediction modelAQS-based prediction modelprediction errorsensor dataCV R 2PurpleAir dataPurpleAir measurementscalibrationair quality systemsensor measurementsPM 2.5 exposure assessment