High-Yield Synthesis of
PPh<sub>3</sub>-Ligated Decanuclear
Tl–Pd Cluster, Pd<sub>9</sub>[Tl(acac)](CO)<sub>9</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub>: Comparative Analysis of Tl(I)–Pd(0)
Bonding Connectivities with Known Tl–Pd Clusters and Resulting
Insight Concerning Their Dissimilar Dynamic Solution Behavior
posted on 2016-02-21, 15:14authored byEvgueni G. Mednikov, Nicky Vo, Charles G. Fry, Lawrence F. Dahl
The new Tl(I)–Pd(0) cluster Pd<sub>9</sub>[μ<sub>3/3</sub>-Tl(acac)](μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>6</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-CO)<sub>3</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub> (<b>1</b>) was
prepared in high yields (over 90%), both by reaction of Pd<sub>10</sub>(CO)<sub>12</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub> (<b>4</b>),
PPh<sub>3</sub>, and TlPF<sub>6</sub> in THF in the presence of acetylacetone
(Hacac) and base (NEt<sub>3</sub>) and by direct reaction of Pd<sub>10</sub>(CO)<sub>12</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub> with PPh<sub>3</sub> and Tl(acac). The composition and molecular structure of <b>1</b> were unambiguously established from 100 K CCD X-ray diffractometry
studies of two solvated crystals, <b>1</b>·1.5Hacac·0.5THF
(<b>1A</b>) and <b>1</b>·0.3THF (<b>1B</b>),
which showed essentially identical geometries for the entire Pd<sub>9</sub>Tl(CO)<sub>9</sub>P<sub>6</sub> fragment of pseudo-<i>C</i><sub>3<i>v</i></sub> symmetry; its composition
is in agreement with X-ray Tl/Pd field-emission microanalysis with
a scanning electron microscope for crystals of <b>1B</b>. This
cluster can be viewed as a markedl<i></i>y deformed Pd<sub>6</sub> octahedron (oct) with the three Pd(oct) atoms of one of its
eight triangular faces connected both by three edge-bridging wingtip
(wt) Pd(μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>2</sub>PPh<sub>3</sub> fragments
and by a symmetrical capping Tl(I). Three triply bridging carbonyl
ligands asymmetrically cap the lower alternate 3-fold-related triangular
faces of the Pd<sub>6</sub> octahedron, and the three other PPh<sub>3</sub> ligands are each coordinated to Pd atoms in the geometrically
opposite staggered Pd(oct)<sub>3</sub> face. The 6s<sup>2</sup>5d<sup>10</sup> Tl(I) is also equivalently attached to both chelating O
atoms of a bidentate acetylacetonate (acac) monoanion. Although the <i>C</i><sub>2</sub> axis of the pseudo-<i>C</i><sub>2<i>v</i></sub> planar Tl(acac) fragment is approximately
parallel to the pseudo-<i>C</i><sub>3</sub> axis of the
TlPd<sub>9</sub> core, the orientation of the Tl(acac) plane relative
to the octahedral-based Pd<sub>9</sub> geometry is considerably different
for each of the three independent nondisordered molecules of <b>1</b> in <b>1A</b> and <b>1B</b>; these different
planar Tl(acac) orientations may be mainly attributed to anisotropic
crystal-packing effects. Coordination of the Tl(I) atom to the three
Pd(oct) atoms of the Pd<sub>9</sub> core presumably occurs via its
so-called “inert” 6s<sup>2</sup> electron pair with
resulting three short Tl–Pd(oct) connectivities of mean distance
2.83 Å; these connectivities together with three longer Tl–Pd(wt)
ones of mean distance 3.15 Å give rise to a (crown-like)Pd<sub>6</sub> sextuple (μ<sub>3/3</sub>-Tl) coordination mode. Of
particular stereochemical interest is a comparison of solution behavior
of <b>1</b> with that for the known structurally related analogue,
Pd<sub>9</sub>[μ<sub>3</sub>-TlCo(CO)<sub>3</sub>L](μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>6</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-CO)<sub>3</sub>L<sub>6</sub> (<b>2</b>) (with L = PEt<sub>3</sub> instead of PPh<sub>3</sub>). In <b>2</b> the Tl(I) is alternatively attached to
a trigonal-bipyramidal Co(CO)<sub>3</sub>L monoanion and primarily
coordinated to the three inner Pd(oct) atoms of a similar PR<sub>3</sub>/CO-ligated octahedron; corresponding Tl–Pd(oct) and Tl–Pd(wt)
mean distances for two independent molecules in <b>2</b> are
2.77 and 3.31 Å, respectively. Variable-temperature <sup>31</sup>P{<sup>1</sup>H} NMR solution data of <b>1</b> indicate the
occurrence of presumed fast wobbling-like motion of the [μ<sub>3/3</sub>-Tl(acac)] entity about the pseudo-<i>C</i><sub>3</sub> axis of the Pd<sub>9</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>6</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-CO)<sub>3</sub>P<sub>6</sub> fragment <i>without Pd–Tl detachment</i> (i.e., the entire cluster
of <b>1</b> remains intact). In direct contrast, corresponding
temperature-dependent <sup>31</sup>P and <sup>13</sup>C NMR data of <b>2</b> instead are consistent with <i>rapid, reversible dissociation/association
of the entire</i> [μ<sub>3</sub>-TlCo(CO)<sub>3</sub>L]
ligand from the analogous Pd<sub>9</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>6</sub>(μ<sub>3</sub>-CO)<sub>3</sub>P<sub>6</sub> fragment
of <b>2</b>. This highly dissimilar dynamic solution behavior
that points to a stronger Tl(I) attachment to the Pd<sub>9</sub> core
in <b>1</b> than that in <b>2</b> may be attributed from
the above crystallographic evidence to greater involvement of the
outer three wingtip Pd(wt) atoms in bonding connectivities to the
Tl(I) in <b>1</b> compared to predominant bonding connectivities
of only the three inner Pd(oct) atoms to the Tl(I) in <b>2</b>. <sup>1</sup>H NMR solution spectra of <b>1</b> also suggest
significant covalent character in the bidentate Tl–O(acac)
bonding in <b>1</b> based upon the observation of H(acac)–Tl
coupling; this premise is consistent with its Tl–O distances
of 2.35 Å (av) being ca. 0.2 Å shorter than those of 2.52
Å (av) found in crystalline Tl(acac), which with no observed
H–Tl NMR coupling in solution implies ionicity of its bidentate
Tl–O bonding. Both <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> conform
to an 86 CVE count expected for an octahedral metal polyhedron based
upon the Tl(I) and each wingtip Pd(μ<sub>2</sub>-CO)<sub>2</sub>L fragment contributing 2 and 4 CVEs, respectively.