posted on 2016-04-14, 00:00authored byYunlong Zi, Hengyu Guo, Zhen Wen, Min-Hsin Yeh, Chenguo Hu, Zhong Lin Wang
Electromagnetic generators (EMGs)
and triboelectric nanogenerators
(TENGs) are the two most powerful approaches for harvesting ambient
mechanical energy, but the effectiveness of each depends on the triggering
frequency. Here, after systematically comparing the performances of
EMGs and TENGs under low-frequency motion (<5 Hz), we demonstrated
that the output performance of EMGs is proportional to the square
of the frequency, while that of TENGs is approximately in proportion
to the frequency. Therefore, the TENG has a much better performance
than that of the EMG at low frequency (typically 0.1–3 Hz).
Importantly, the extremely small output voltage of the EMG at low
frequency makes it almost inapplicable to drive any electronic unit
that requires a certain threshold voltage (∼0.2–4 V),
so that most of the harvested energy is wasted. In contrast, a TENG
has an output voltage that is usually high enough (>10–100
V) and independent of frequency so that most of the generated power
can be effectively used to power the devices. Furthermore, a TENG
also has advantages of light weight, low cost, and easy scale up through
advanced structure designs. All these merits verify the possible killer
application of a TENG for harvesting energy at low frequency from
motions such as human motions for powering small electronics and possibly
ocean waves for large-scale blue energy.