posted on 2016-01-12, 00:00authored byMarc E. J. Stettler, William J. B. Midgley, Jacob J. Swanson, David Cebon, Adam M. Boies
Dual
fuel diesel and natural gas heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) operate
on a combination of the two fuels simultaneously. By substituting
diesel for natural gas, vehicle operators can benefit from reduced
fuel costs and as natural gas has a lower CO2 intensity
compared to diesel, dual fuel HGVs have the potential to reduce greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions from the freight sector. In this study, energy
consumption, greenhouse gas and noxious emissions for five after-market
dual fuel configurations of two vehicle platforms are compared relative
to their diesel-only baseline values over transient and steady state
testing. Over a transient cycle, CO2 emissions are reduced
by up to 9%; however, methane (CH4) emissions due to incomplete
combustion lead to CO2e emissions that are 50–127%
higher than the equivalent diesel vehicle. Oxidation catalysts evaluated
on the vehicles at steady state reduced CH4 emissions by
at most 15% at exhaust gas temperatures representative of transient
conditions. This study highlights that control of CH4 emissions
and improved control of in-cylinder CH4 combustion are
required to reduce total GHG emissions of dual fuel HGVs relative
to diesel vehicles.