Version 2 2024-10-30, 11:49Version 2 2024-10-30, 11:49
Version 1 2024-10-24, 20:09Version 1 2024-10-24, 20:09
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-30, 11:49authored byNegar Rajabi, Matthew Gene Scarfo, Cole Martin Fredericks, Ramón Santiago Herrera Restrepo, Azin Adibi, Hamed Shahsavan
ConspectusUntethered small-scale (milli-, micro-, and
nano-) soft robots
promise minimally invasive and targeted medical procedures in tiny,
flooded, and confined environments like inside the human body. Despite
such potentials, small-scale robots have not yet found their way to
real-world applications. This can be mainly attributed to the fundamental
and technical challenges in the fabrication, powering, navigation,
imaging, and closed-loop control of robots at submillimiter scales.
Pertinent to this Account, the selection of building block materials
of small-scale robots also poses a challenge that is directly related
to their fabrication and function.Early work in microrobotics
focused on the mechanism of locomotion
in fluids with low Reynolds number (Re ≪ 1),
which was mainly inspired by the motility of cells and microorganisms.
Looking closely at the motile cells and microorganisms, one can find
both order and anisotropy within their microstructure, driving out-of-equilibrium
asymmetric deformations of their soft bodies and appendages like cilia
and flagella, resulting in locomotion and function in environments
with low Re number. Microroboticists aim to mimic
microorganisms’ locomotion and function in developing mobile
small-scale robots. It is known that soft, ordered, and anisotropic
microstructures of microorganisms are examples of liquid crystalline
systems. With this in mind, we believe that liquid crystals are underutilized
in the design of small-scale robots, even though they have remarkable
similarities to biological materials and constructs.In this
Account, we have shed light on the role liquid crystals
have played and can play in the design of small-scale robots. For
this, we have first elaborated on the fundamentals of liquid crystals,
which include a discussion of the various types of liquid crystals
and their characteristics, their mesophase behavior, and their anisotropic
properties. Then, we have discussed the applicability of anisotropic
elastic networks of liquid crystals in the design of actuators which
must satisfy all four programming pillars, including elasticity, alignment,
responsiveness, and initial geometry. We have highlighted landmark
reports where anisotropic elastic networks of liquid crystals, such
as liquid crystal elastomers (LCEs), networks (LCNs), and hydrogels,
are utilized as structural materials in the design of soft, small-scale
actuators and robots. We point out the prevalence of the nematic phase
and thermotropic liquid crystals utilized in these constructs over
other mesophases and liquid crystal types as part of our discussion
on the pros and cons of liquid crystals for microrobotics research.
Finally, paths forward for the widespread applicability of liquid
crystal microrobotics are envisaged. Specifically, the potential of
soft robots constructed from elastic networks of chromonic and micellar
lyotropic liquid crystals provides a substantial, yet daunting, opportunity
for research. Furthermore, miniaturizing these constructs through
innovative, combinatorial alignment–fabrication strategies
on the microscale could realize liquid crystal soft robots suitable
for biomedical applications, unlike those made from thermotropic liquid
crystals. Additionally, programming alignment in alternative mesophases,
such as smectic, may portray new research avenues in this emerging
technology.